We Pray For The Painful Death Of The EU And NATO.

The European Commission spent a decade quietly pressuring Silicon Valley to silence speech they didn’t like. Not illegal speech. Not dangerous speech. Political speech. Conservative speech. Speech about immigration, COVID-19, gender ideology, and election integrity.

It's a good read, not to mention a source of reference. It would behoove one to save this file as a PDF document for future reading and research. The EU is a pathetic organization, so are the people in the high echelons of the UK political establishment and by extension, the UK it self.

The United States doesn't escape this net either, since by Dr. Malone's estimation, many of the original proponents of the censorship machine, the Digital Services Act, were indeed, US officials from the US uni-party. They're the same people who are pushing age verification acts which aren't verifying any such thing since to verify, one would need proof of age.

Which is the intent of these power grabbing tyrants in the first place. They have even gone so far, as to require, meaning forcing, operating system developers to include so-called, age verification requirements into their projects. I'm not a lawyer, but such requirements seem to thread all over the fist amendment and perhaps, even others. However, tyrants do not believe in constitutionality unless they are tyrannical.

Instead of proposing age requirements for what devices minors can purchase or indeed, leaving the protection of minors to their parents, the tyrannical censors prefer to limit the rights or freedoms of the population, which the mean to control. They do not care about the rights of minors, they just wish to expand their surveillance, police state.

Anyway, Dr. Malone's article is a long one and deserves to be read. I have already made copies of the document and transferred it to my eBook reader so that I'll have more time to digest the material while I sunbathe.

#Censorship #ZOG #1A #EU #Tyranny

Here's another one showing, just what type of duplicitous people, we're discussing here.

If one's memory is short, then all one has to do, is make some searches on one's favorite search engine using the words, “black rifle company turned on Kyle Rittenhouse.” That may rekindle one's memories or perhaps, if this is the first time hearing this, then it may offer some pertinent insights.

Black Rifle Coffee was the darling of MAGA, gun owners, patriots and veterans all over the nation and they probably still are among some people, however some people have never given them a second look or chance, since the day they sold Kyle Rittenhouse, down the river, for less than the customary, thirty pieces of silver, when the young lad protected himself from the state sponsored thugs of BLM and ANTIFA.

Obviously, this should be carefully noted, that if one is a white man defending himself from communist state owned operatives, with a firearm, then that makes one, an extremist right winger, an extremist white supremacists or a supreme white extremists. The politicians, the deep state, other federal bureaucrats and their big money backers, want white extinction, white genocide and white replacement and denials of these facts are one's prerogative. Just look around. How long will it take white America, to organize, to becoming a bloc and using the system, the same way that foreigners and invaders do? How long before they wise up and stop spending their money, buy products and services from their enemies?

#AntiWhiteism #WhiteGenocide #WhiteReplacement #LostChristians #Cristianity_InCommon #Freedom #FreeSpeech #1A

It's unconstitutional to ban speech or associations, just because we may not like that speech or those associations. These people like Brett don't really care about freedom, sure they're selective with the kinds of freedoms they think should be protected but deep down they're no different from the people who would ban Trump from Twitter or refuse to broadcast his rallies.

MRC President Brent Bozell pulled no punches in addressing where his organization stands regarding the recently introduced TikTok ban. Bozell is wrong on this he wants to ban TikTok because he doesn't like the platform and that's all about his feelings being hurt. That's not constitutional. In fact that's the very definition of being unconstitutional. Do any of you agree with him?

What happens when congress, the democrats, the deep state or the republicans deem your website a national security threat? What happens when they do that to MRC, Newsbusters? What happens when they do the same thing to Elon Musk's Twitter, Rumble, Odysee or your federated content management platform? They'll steamroll us if we give them the tools to do it. Leave TikTok alone, it is a Trojan horse to eventually allow the government to take down any website they hate.

#TikTok #1A #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #US_Congress