Ebrius Disputatios

The “Internet switch” may soon become the “Copyright Police.”

How long have the Hollywood Jews, and their fellow tribesmen in the music industry, been buying congressmen and judges to prevent the free sharing of digital media? How well have those measures worked so far? Must they keep inserting themselves in every facet of our lives? They spy on us through our devices they steal our information and their bought and paid for represetatives in congress and the courts, reward them with even more restrictions on our rights, while we just continue to grin and bear it. If they want to prevent, alleged piracy, why don't they make thier files unsharable? Why are our rights up for grabs in the fucking balance? Yet another reason, as if needed, to absulutely, despise the Jews.

In the United States, the FADPA bill is being prepared, which simplifies the blocking of foreign pirate sites through telecom operators and DNS providers. The defenders of consumer rights are afraid that the initiative will turn Internet providers into a “copyright police” and will block resources at a global level.

The FADPA bill, initiated by the Democrat Zoe Lofgren, provides for the blocking of foreign pirate resources by court decision in the United States. Blocking will be carried out by large Internet providers and DNS suppliers. Legislators claim that the law will not limit the freedom of the Internet, but will only affect copyright violators. The development of the document took more than a year and was conducted with the participation of representatives of the IT industry, cinema and television.

FADPA will oblige to block the pirate resources of Internet providers with 100 thousand subscribers and DNS services with annual revenue of more than $ 100 million. Exceptions are provided for VPN services, DNS providers using encryption, and operators for which telecom services are not the main business .

To receive a warrant, the copyright holder must apply to the US court, proving a violation of his rights and potential damage. After receiving the preliminary order, the copyright holder will be able to achieve a resource block. Judges will not prescribe specific technical decisions to the providers. The operator of the blocked site will have 30 days to appeal the solution.

The law is directed against sites originally created for piracy that do not have legal sources of income or deliberately promoted as a platform for the spread of pirate content. The Russian Avito and VKontakte, included in the list of counterfeit markets, are unlikely to be blocked. The situation with Rutracker and Libgen is more ambiguous, since copyright holders have long been trying to close them.

FADPA is criticized by Public Knowledge and Re: Create Coalition. Public Knowledge believes that the law will turn providers into a “copyright police”, and Re: Create Coalition calls it the “Internet switch”. Public Knowledge also notes that locks can be global due to the participation of the largest DNS providers.