Ebrius Disputatios

How the mighty have fallen, Liz Chaney is truly a woman without a country. No doubt losing her congressional seat has lowered her status and we all know how seriously women view status. However, like most downfalls, it is almost, always self inflicted.

So Joe Biden, the resident of the White House plans to reward the ineptitude of the so called January six committee. Both Biden and Chaney are despicable people. The mere fact that the Biden team lacks the self awareness of their actions or behaviors revels the farce of this whole corrupt, in the bubble politics.

Chaney was rejected by her constituency. Her political career and reputation is broken. Joe Biden is a senile fool and it's anybody's guess, as to who is running the country. Congress is out to lunch, they don't seem to be bothered that some puppet master is sitting in the captains chair.

Whomever is running things in the US is setting up all types of roadblocks and booby traps for the next administration. We shouldn't have to worry though, as this isn't our country. We're just here for the fucking ride over the cliff.

Joe Biden is giving medals to these two shit birds. This is not a serious country.

Joe Biden is such an idiot. The guy didn't win shit in 2020 but everyone is fine playing pretend. Someone mentioned that I should really call these people idiots since they're not entirely that. They're just obedient to their masters. Us politics is just plain, Kabuki theater. Everything is a farce.

The judges consider that the Federal Communications Commission does not have the power to impose regulation.

Indeed, the brilliant White founding fathers, made a constitution which empowered the US Congress to make law and have the power to impose regulation. Nowhere in the US Constitution or in the spirit of freedom and liberty did they entrust lawmaking or the imposition of regulation, to unelected, bureaucrats to do so. If this were the case, that unelected bureaucrats to be entrusted with such power, then we need another revolution an we need a king.

Does anyone remember the wild, wild west of the internet when there was no net neutrality? When there was Napster, BittTorrent and no rules proposed, in congress to make file sharing illegal, by that fucking Jew Chuck Schumer? We remember. Those were good times. Think on that. That's another reason to banish all Jews, in the West, home to their precious Israel. However, as per usual, we digress.

Below is an article written by some foreign fuck, named Miguel Jiménez, a man we are sure, knows nothing about the US Constitution, the law or truths or rights. Fuck him, he does not matter. We suspect that he may also be a Jew. Just saying. I mean look at the beak on that fucker. It was originally written in Spanish and here is the translation.

Net neutrality is not what it used to be. There was a time when it was thought that this principle was vital to avoid a discriminatory Internet and that the future of the Internet depended on a rule that prevented broadband providers from blocking or slowing access to certain content. The evolution of the market has diminished the importance of that principle, but the swords were still raised in the conceptual, regulatory and legal battle. This Thursday, a court shelved the matter in the United States by concluding that the Biden Administration's Federal Communications Commission (FCC) exceeded its powers by reinstating net neutrality last year.

In a 26-page ruling that resolves more than a dozen appeals at a stroke, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth US Judicial Circuit, based in Cincinnati (Ohio), repeals net neutrality. Curiously, to reach his conclusion, he establishes that Internet access is not a telecommunications service but an information service. Since it is not comparable to telephone service, the Communications Act would not give the FCC the power to impose such regulation.

Said law says in its article 153 (24) that an information service is considered “the offer of a capacity to generate, acquire, store, transform, process, recover, use or make available information through telecommunications, and includes the electronic publication, but does not include any use of such capacity for the management, control or operation of a telecommunications system or the management of a telecommunications service.

“The key here is not whether broadband internet service providers use telecommunications, but whether they do so by offering consumers the ability to do more,” the judges reason, threading that distinction very finely. “Telephone service is limited to transmitting what an interlocutor creates; It does not give access to information,” they explain. With similar reasoning, using another article of the law, the judges conclude that mobile broadband is neither a telecommunications service nor a “commercial mobile service,” but rather a “private mobile service.”

Since the law only expressly enabled the FCC to regulate telecommunications services and the judges conclude that broadband access is not, they apply the new Supreme Court doctrine that restricts the regulatory power of federal agencies. They apply the Supreme Court's reasoning from a case last year (Loper Bright Enterprises against Raimondo), which revoked the so-called Chevron doctrine of 1984.

The FCC shielded the principle of Net neutrality in 2015, during the presidency of Barack Obama. With the arrival of Donald Trump to the White House and Republican dominance of the FCC board, the regulator decided to eliminate it in 2017. The effects were limited. There were already experts who pointed out that the apocalyptic predictions were somewhat exaggerated. Last April, the Democratic majority of the FCC approved the new regulation, now annulled, by which Internet service providers were once again expressly prohibited from blocking legal content from Internet service providers, throttling speeds and creating fast lanes that favor those who can pay for access.

For users there are already different access rates depending on download speed or data limit, but what the rule prevented was discriminating against the content of platforms such as Netflix or YouTube or requiring payment in exchange for quality access to their content. , which consume a large part of the network capacity. It is a traditional battle for operators, who complain about having to undertake the network investments that these free transmission services (known as OTT, over the top) take advantage of.

One of the biggest critics of the regulation was the current secretary general of the FCC, Brandan Carr, who has been proposed by Trump as president of said body. Carr highlighted “the apocalyptic rhetoric”, in his opinion unjustified, that accompanied the repeal of the principle of net neutrality in 2017. “The media and politicians meaninglessly parroted his claims. They predicted 'the end of the Internet as we know it'. Consumers would have to pay to access the websites. None of that happened. “Americans were subjected to one of the biggest deceptions in the history of regulation,” he said then. The market was preparing for another regulatory lurch that the ruling issued this Thursday makes unnecessary.

Some Democratic congressmen advocate that Net neutrality be established with a federal law, but with a Republican majority in both chambers, that is for now a mirage. Jessica Rosenworcel, Democratic chair of the FCC, advocated in a statement for that hypothetical solution. “Consumers across the country have told us time and time again that they want a fast, open and fair Internet. With this decision, it is clear that Congress must heed their request, assume Net neutrality and include the principles of the open Internet in federal legislation,” he said.

We eluded to the ZOG Empire Deep State as the culprits behind the recent terror cluster fuck that occurred on New Years Day. One wonders just how many people are aware of that. Indeed, our hopes are that we're part of a growing, awakening majority, or soon to be.

We were elated when our friends and brothers at Infostormer.com, came to the same conclusion. That being the reality, this puts us in with some excellent company.

Obviously all we have at this time is pure speculation, with a few spoonfuls of experience and cynicism. We're surrounded by Satan forces and their minions. These actions fit right in with their skill set. Actions such as these are their modus operendi.

Whatever the motivation or the perpetrators our guesses are about as truthful as anything that the government, deep state or the mockingbird media are parroting. All the above mentioned entities have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously.

Here are Links to my previous posts pointing to those ZOG goblins:

• Deep State New Years Terrorism.
• What Will The Deep State Outlaw First, Guns Or Cars?

Public Domain Day 2025 in Literature – Blog

We think that we have found another cool place to score some really good eBooks. I'm creating this post, just as a reminder of this site, which is still fresh in my memory and this will also act as a reminder. Even though I've bookmarked it, in several locations.

Around the world, people celebrate Public Domain Day on January 1, the day in which copyright expires on some older works and they enter the public domain in many different countries.

In the U.S. Constitution, copyright terms were meant to be very limited in order to “promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.” The first copyright act, written in 1790 by the founding fathers themselves, set the term to be up to twenty-eight years.

But since then, powerful corporations have repeatedly extended the length of copyright to promote not the progress of society, but their profit. The result is that today in the U.S., work only enters the public domain ninety-five years after publication—locking our culture away for nearly a century.

2019 was the year in which new works were finally scheduled to enter the public domain, ending this long, corporate-dictated cultural winter. And as that year drew closer, it became clear that these corporations wouldn’t try to extend copyright yet again—making it the first year in almost a century in which a significant amount of art and literature once again entered the U.S. public domain, free for anyone in the U.S. to read, use, share, remix, build upon, and enjoy.

Ever since then, we’ve been celebrating Public Domain Day by preparing some of the year’s biggest literary hits for you to read on January 1.

Police forces investigate the scene of an explosion outside a fence at a police area in Berlin-Wittenau.

The year 2025, is really on to an explosive beginning. In Berlin Today, Tomorrow my time, there has been an explosion, outside the fence of a police area. Whatever that means. It's still early on so no immediate details are yet known. Don't kill the messenger. I did furnish some links that may or may not be useful. This is indeed, the mockingbird media network, in which we're dealing with.

An unidentified object exploded beside the fence.

Think Captchas Are Frustrating? Try This New Doom Version.

Completely Automated Public Turing tests to tell Computers and Humans Apart have been frustrating internet users for years. Preventing the likes of account-creating bots, spam, data-scaping, etc., is important, but it's hard to remember that fact when squinting at a squiggled word on the screen, or faced with the dilemma of whether that tiny bit of bicycle handle peeking into a square means you should select it.

Israel also reportedly believes that Iran is “isolated” following the ousting of Syria’s Bashar Assad and that its main ally in the region, Hezbollah, has been significantly weakened by the recent IDF offensive there. This could push Iran to accelerate its nuclear program, creating a window of opportunity for an Israeli preemptive strike, according to the Times of Israel.

Biden Considered Attack On Iran Nuclear Sites.

Rolling Stone magazine has an article discussing the possibility that the Trump Deep State will be allegedly planning covert military operations in presumably, Mexican areas seeking to neutralize Cartel operatives. That's perhaps, all of Mexico by now.

Rolling Stone seems to be relying on alleged former commandos, veterans formerly employed in the US armed forces. Now anyone familiar with US military personnel, active duty or prior service, they'll know that the one thing GIs and veterans have plenty of, are war stories.

Rolling Stone is rolling with the war stories comprising of fantastical tales of valor which from the looks of it, combined with the reputation of Rolling Stone, always being wrong, seems more like valor's excrement. At least that's our opinion on the matter.

At the same time while Rolling Stone is passing on war stories there's an article in the New York Times paywall, discussing how Mexico has become dangerous for Americans recently, with ambushes, execution style murders and cartel power struggles. We'll link to the story here. However, be warned that this is a paywall link but it's included for accuracy.

The link is an article accounting the shooting of a fourteen year old anchor baby who traveled to Durango Mexico, about six hundred (600) miles south of El Paso, Texas with his estranged father, his nine year old brother, his father's brother and others. They were reportedly staying at his paternal grandfather's house and were ambushed around 9:00 PM, while making a food and alcohol run. The teenager was the only survivor, he was shot in the back of the head.

Both the New York times and The Rolling Stone are Jewish owned rags with their own agendas. One wonders what they would have us do with Mexico and Mexican violence. Obviously, we can't condone military strikes into a sovereign nation. That would fit right into the trend of US expeditionary wars, internationally. We could however, start building a great wall, with US labor and have a program that arrests and deport illegal aliens. Of course that will never happen but men can dream.

Jason Peña, an American teenager, was shot in Durango, Mexico, and remains in critical condition. His father, Vicente Peña Jr., died in the same attack.Credit...via Jason Peña's family

Elon Musk is an advisor to US President-elect Donald Trump. The tech billionaire has recently repeatedly supported right-wing populists.

This according to a German rag known as Zeit Online. Birds of a feather, flock together. They're both shills for the Israeli lobby. It's the only way to get paid these days and keep doing so. Neither Robinson or Musk are right wing anything, from our stand point.

Robinson seems to be against the mass immigration of third world types into Britain but he seems more focused on Islamic types. He may also think that there are far too many blacks in Britain too. That's not so clear. However, what is clear is that Robinson, like Musk, is also another Jewish shill. He doesn't seem to mind them being in Britain in overwhelming numbers at all. How very odd.

One wonders if Tommy has a problem with Indians replacing White Brits in the technology industry. We already know Elons sentiments on the matter. Someone should ask Tommy boy about his views on the subject. It's really none of our business at any rate. We render unto Elon and Tommy, what is theirs. They aren't our friends and in our minds, they're just con men of a different sort. Also, spending forty four billion dollars on a social media network is just silly and wasteful.

After this week's latest terrorist kabuki, where both guns and cars were involved, it must be pressing on the deep state and their apparatchiks in the media, as to which device needs more demonizing. We can't wait to see how they'll pull it off.

We're not surprised by this attack since we reckoned that since Trump is soon to be the next president, we expect there to be more school shootings, more acts of gun violence and more alleged terrorist attacks. After all, the deep state, still need us disarmed. What surprises us most of all, is that they haven't started blaming the Russians yet. Also, we can't wait until they announce that Jabbar al Snackbar, is also a White supremacist.

Speaking of Russians, here's a breakdown of this latest deep state operation, from the Russian press outfit, RT.

US federal authorities are investigating the attack in New Orleans, Louisiana, as an “act of terrorism,” after at least 15 people were killed and dozens more injured when a US Army veteran drove an SUV into a crowd celebrating the New Year.