Ebrius Disputatios

A thing's not wrong because it's illegal, a thing is illegal because it's wrong.

This Is The Trump We Need.

Image/photo

The mockingbird media would be driven to even more insanity and that would be half the fun. Worst Nazi ever.

#Trump #Niggers #Nazis #Fake_News #Mockingbird_Media

Ursa Major Sinks To Bring Norway To Disgrace.

Ursa Major Sinks To Bring Norway To Disgrace.

The Norwegian-flagged Oslo Carrier 3 ship refused to rescue Russian sailors from the Ursa Major ship as the latter was sinking in the Mediterranean Sea, RIA Novosti said with reference to the press service of the Oboronlogistics group of companies, the operator of the sunken ship.

The lifeboat with Russian sailors from the sinking ship headed towards the Norwegian-flagged Oslo Carrier 3 ship which was staying nearby.

“When the lifeboat approached, the Norwegian ship (part of crew of the Norwegian ship spoke Russian) refused to accept the Ursa Major crew members. They referred to a certain prohibition,” Oboronlogistics, the operator of the sunken Ursa Major cargo ship said.

The decision not to help the Russian sailors was made in gross violation of Article 10 of the International Convention on Salvage of 1989, the company added.

Russian cargo vessel Ursa Major, built in 2009, sank in the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of Spain and Algeria on December 23. A rescue operation was carried out in the disaster area.

Two Russian sailors are still unaccounted for.

The vessel was sailing under the Russian flag from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok. According to Oboronlogistics, the ship sank as a result of a terrorist attack. Fourteen crew members were rescued and taken to the port of Cartagena (Spain), two crew members are missing. All of them are Russian citizens. According to Spanish newspaper El diario vasco, the Ursa Major ship sank after an explosion in the engine room.

The Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed reports about the explosion.

“The Russian dry cargo ship Ursa Major (owned by SK-YUG LLC) sank in the international waters of the Mediterranean Sea after an explosion in the engine room,” the ministry said.

The Ursa Major is a universal dry cargo ship of the RO-RO/LO-LO class. The flagship of the Oboronlogistics fleet, Ursa Major (translated from Latin as Big Dipper), set off on another voyage to the Far East with port cranes weighing 380 tons each, and 45-ton hatch covers for new icebreakersю The maximum capacity of the vessel reaches 9.5 thousand tons. The Ursa Major was supposed to arrive in Vladivostok on January 22.

Norway explains decision not to help Russian sailors in time of need.

The Norwegian-flagged Oslo Carrier 3 refused to take the Russian sailors from the Ursa Major on board, because another ship was already on its way to help the Russians, representatives for the Bulkship Management, the owner of the Norwegian ship said.

“The rescue operation was carried out by the Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre in Cartagena (MRCC; Spain), which is responsible for such operations in the area. The MRCC ordered the captain not to take the crew from the ship in distress on board, because their rescue ship was en route to the scene,” the Norwegian company said.

The lifeboat was secured to the Oslo Carrier 3 until the rescue ship arrived, Norwegian officials added.

“The weather was good, none of the lifeboat crew members were injured, there was no immediate danger to them,” Bulkship Management said and showed photos of the rescue operation.

Medvedev: Such decisions cannot be forgiven.

The refusal of a Norwegian vessel to accept the Russian sailors from the sinking cargo ship is a decision that cannot be forgiven, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev said. Europe should be severely punished for such an act, he believes.

“Why so harshly? How else could it be given the facts? The ship flying the Norwegian flag Oslo Carrier 3 refused to help the Russian sailors from the Ursa Major ship. The people were drowning in the Mediterranean Sea. Does anyone else need any other explanations? This cannot be forgiven!” Medvedev said.

#UrsaMajor #Norway #Russia #InternationalLaw #Disgrace

Energy saving on the scale of the whole world can be calculated by gigawatt hours.

Researchers from the University of Waterloo presented an elegant solution to reduce the energy consumption of data centers, a small modification of the Linux kernel. This is relevant, given the growing load on energy resources created by computing systems, which now account for about 5% of world energy consumption. Date centers, being a critical part of modern infrastructure, make a significant contribution to this consumption.

The team of scientists, led by Professor Martin Karsten, found ineffectiveness in the processing of network traffic with high intensity of communications. The decision they have proposed is to optimize the Linux network stack. The rearrangement of operations allows you to achieve an increase in performance and energy efficiency. Tests showed an increase in throughput to 45% in certain scenarios without deterioration of delay indicators. Professor Karsten compares this with the optimization of the conveyor in production, which allows you to more effectively use the processor cache in the data centers.

In collaboration with Joe Damato, an engineer from Fastly, a compact and non intrusive change in the kernel, consisting of only 30 lines of code, was developed. This small modification is able to reduce energy consumption in critically important operations of the data center by 30%. The key element of innovation is the function of suspension of interruptions (IRQ), which allows you to effectively balance the energy consumption of the processor and data processing. By reducing the number of interruptions during peak loads, it is possible to increase the productivity of the network, while maintaining a low delay during periods of reduced activity.

The effectiveness of the solution is confirmed by tests, and the code is already integrated into the latest version of the Linux 6.13 kernel. This opens the way for the wide implementation of modification in the technological industry. If key market players, such as Amazon, Google and Meta, will make this solution, potential energy saving on the scale of the whole world can be calculated by gigawatt hours. According to Professor Karsten, almost every request on the Internet can be processed more efficiently due to this modification.

from The Daily Fetched

South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham said he believes President Donald Trump’s decision to pardon and release the January 6 hostages was a “mistake.”

During an appearance on NBC, the RINO Senator told Kirsten Welker that the January 6 victims were no better than the Black Lives Matter rioters, who burned down cities across the United States.

Those who protested the legitimacy of the 2020 election lost everything after being thrown in jail as Democrats rushed to frame Trump with a fake narrative that he incited a riot.

However, the media ignored that Trump told protestors to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol.

Welker asked Graham, “Let’s turn now to President Trump’s decision to pardon, to give blanket pardons to, everyone who was convicted of crimes on January 6, including the 172 people who pleaded guilty to assaulting law enforcement officers. Even his own Vice President said, “If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned.” Do you believe President Trump was wrong to issue these blanket pardons to the January 6 defendants?”

READ: Lindsey Graham Says Quiet Part Out Loud on Real Reason Behind Ukraine War

Graham responded: “Number one, he had the legal authority to do it, but I fear that you will get more violence. Pardoning the people who went into the Capitol and beat up a police officer violently, I think, was a mistake because it seems to suggest that’s an okay thing to do.”

“Kamala Harris wanted to raise bail money for people burning down Minneapolis. You know, Biden pardoned half his family going out the door. I think most Americans, if this continues, to see this as an abuse of the pardon power, that we’ll revisit the pardon power of the president if this continues, but as to pardoning violent people who beat up cops, I think that’s a mistake,” he said.

Welker asked, “So, you think it was a mistake of President Trump to issue these blanket pardons? What message does it convey to law enforcement?”

Graham responded: “There’s really been no better supporter of law enforcement in general, and there are a lot of people who supported President Trump in law enforcement who didn’t like this.”

“But he said it during the campaign. He’s not tricking people. You know, Biden promised not to pardon his family.”

“He did. Trump said I’m gonna pardon these people. So, the fact that he did it is no surprise, but I’ll be consistent here,” he added.

“I don’t like the idea of bailing people out of jail or pardoning people who burned down cities and beat up cops whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat.”

READ: Trump Rips Lindsey Graham in Epic Post Reminding Him He’s a Warmonger.

The post Lindsey Graham Lets Mask Slip, Calls Trump’s Jan 6 Pardons a “Mistake” appeared first on The Daily Fetched.

#News #Politics #Donald Trump #January 6 #Lindsey Graham #top news

Tyranny: How Central Banks Plan to Control You.

Visit our full library for more content.

“The Danger of Central Bank Digital Currencies” Catherine Austin Fitts Solari, Inc.

This speech was given on November 11, 2024, during a Hillsdale College CCA seminar on “Economic Issues and Controversies.”

Donald Trump recently made a post on Truth Social making threats to Russia and he also had a few facts, wrong. We've included a transcript of that post and it is as follows:

I’m not looking to hurt Russia. I love the Russian people, and always had a very good relationship with President Putin – and this despite the Radical Left’s Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX.

We must never forget that Russia helped us win the Second World War, losing almost 60,000,000 lives in the process. All of that being said, I’m going to do Russia, whose Economy is failing, and President Putin, a very big FAVOR.

Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous War! IT’S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE. If we don’t make a “deal,” and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries. Let’s get this war, which never would have started if I were President, over with! We can do it the easy way, or the hard way – and the easy way is always better. It’s time to “MAKE A DEAL.” NO MORE LIVES SHOULD BE LOST!!!

Donald Trump seems to know very little about World War II apparently and it is quite obvious, that he knows even less about Russia and or the Russian people. Looking at his post, Trump announces that the Russians helped us, to win the second world war. Did Trump go to public school? He probably should have, his parents would have saved themselves some money with a better return. The Soviets did the bulk of the heavy lifting during the war and they lost an estimated twenty eight million souls fighting that war in various different battles, not sixty million. One is beginning to wonder, if the Russians are as sceptical of Mr. Trump's ability to effect any changes in the conflict at all, since he clearly doesn't have the correct information at hand about what is truly going on in the Ukrainian theatre or history for that matter.

He then speaks of the war and that it will get worse. He has that part right, but it will only get worse for the Ukrainian military and the supporters of this proxy war. Zelenski is setting a trap for Trump and he doesn't seem to be intelligent enough to be aware of it. Zelensky has already spoken of needing American boots on the ground to fight the Russians for him and his regime. He wants security guarantees for a cease fire which if Trump is foolish enough to indulge him, will be broken by the Ukranians, who will then call in their security marker and soon thereafter, World War three would commence.

Why does Trump care about this fucking war? It isn't his war, it is Joe Biden and the neocons who own this war. Trump would be wise to stress this point at every opportunity. Even now, the media keeps asking Trump about the war because they have been told to do so, in the effort to disassociate it from Biden and substitute Trump as the new owner. Does he not realize this? Perhaps, he wants this war all to himself. The Russians are sanctions proof. They have been preparing for this very inevitability since 2014, when they realized the plan of globalists and their ZOG allies. There is nothing that any toothless paper tigers can do that will hurt Russia now. Trump may be persuaded to talk the Russians into submission with one of his repetitive speeches that would surely put them to sleep.

I would like to do Trump a favor. I would like him to wash his hands of this war. The Russians are winning they have no incentive to ease up on the Ukrainians, they're not going to give them chances to rest up, rebuild their arsenals to fight again another day. That will only prolong the war. Also, the Russians want, once and for all, to eliminate all threats that the Ukrainians pose. The Russians have been very clear on this, apparently the Trump team wasn't listening. The Russians also want the Ukrainian wannabe Nazis eliminated too. The Russians mean business and no amount of bluffing from some fat New York fuck, is going to stop them. The US has been destroyed by the subversive elements within, read Jews. The US military is overrun with faggots and fat black women, the Russians would be doing us a favor to rid us of them. If Trump wants a bigger conflict, which he will own, he's welcome to it. Many of us didn't vote for anyone in this dubious election atmosphere. We've washed our hands of this system and we can't wait until it crumbles to the ground.

The United States once a cherished treasure, is now, akin to a dilapidated house that can never be repaired. It is too far gone and should be torn down and hopefully built anew, if possible. If not, it should be abandoned altogether, as the walls and foundations have been corrupted and soon the entire will begin to implode upon itself anyway.

Nothing here really, except that TikTok was just fine when it was just subverting the morals and culture of White Americans. However, once there was content which was anti Palestinian genocide and anti Israeli aggression, then there were moves to restrict the first amendment of one hundred, seventy, million Americans. It would seem that there is a minority of very important people, who are much more important that Americans and their alleged constitutional rights. A majority of the US Congress and the US Supreme Court, seem to think so as well. In the alleged free spaces of the US, one is free until one criticizes Israel and or the Jews. Perhaps, it's just one's antisemitism at play here.

It is generally accepted that under Donald Trump as president of the United States, the Chinese company ByteDance will have to sell its American assets, since the law adopted in April last year, requires control over the activities of the social network from the American authorities through one of the local companies. Meanwhile, some sources familiar with the negotiation process informed Bloomberg that ByDance is still considering to do without selling their American business. There are still no concrete revelations on just how this feat will be accomplished.

At least this was stated by a member of the ByteDance Board, Bill Ford, who simultaneously heads General Atlantic, which is a shareholder of the Chinese developer TikTok stated that in his opinion, the sale of TikTok assets in the United States is not inevitable. The parties are trying to find alternatives that would find an equitable solution. ByteDance is interested in continuing to work in the United States. Ford is evaluating alternative solutions that will allow for a more constructive beneficial solution if possible.

If democracy can't withstand free speech, then we want nothing to do with it. It's funny how all the globalist are determined to save their “democracy,” by making speech illegal. What's next shall our thoughts no longer be anonymous as well? These people are our enemies and we must be ready for when they strike.

Losing Control: Sánchez Aims To End Online Anonymity To ‘Save Democracy’ From Tech CEOs

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez speaks during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos

Self-aggrandizing Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez badly wants to be the face of the ‘global resistance’ to technology billionaires. In peak Orwellian doublespeak, he accused CEOs like Musk and Zuckerberg of using their social media platforms to concentrate “power and wealth in the hands of just a few … at the cost of our democracies.” The comments came in Davos, in front of the wealthiest and most powerful audience possible.

from Linux.org.ru

Google now notifies users that JavaScript must be enabled in their browser to use search. Earlier, the foreign resource TechCrunch contacted Google employees to find out the reasons for this decision. This measure is due to the fight against bots, as well as the fact that most users use the search engine with JavaScript enabled, and many do not even know how to disable it. Only 0.1% of Google search users turned it off.

This seems like a bullshit reason. Firstly, its much safer for users to disable Javascript and bots would more likely use Javascript in the first place. Javascript allows Google to snoop ever so much more in their quest for surveillance.

While this is only just one company doing this for now, what happens when they all do? What are the solutions if any to do internet searches without using search engines?

While Trump wants peace in Ukraine, European politicians continue to act as warmongers. No wonder, because if there is peace in Ukraine, how are they supposed to explain to their voters what all this was for?

von Anti-Spiegel

Europe continues to destroy itself with Ukraine.

And now to Europe. American billionaire Elon Musk does not stop his attacks on the Old World. After beginning in January to accuse British Prime Minister Starmer of covering up for Pakistanis who raped more than a thousand British girls and calling for the government's resignation, Musk this week accused Starmer of interfering in the American election have. Musk wrote that the English prime minister “sent agents to America to undermine the US elections.”

Starmer has still not found arguments to answer the American. That's what cartoons came for. The Times portrays Musk as an ugly musk rat in the style of old zoology books. It's a play on words: Musk means musk in English. The cartoon is captioned: “The musk rat. Elonis robinsonis. A frighteningly smelly, giant aquatic rodent native to America. Has been introduced to Great Britain and Europe and is destroying native species. Swim with sharks.”

Donald Trump, whom the Spectator portrayed on its front page as a Viking on his way to Greenland, also took a hit.

Is it any wonder that the prime minister of Britain, America's most important ally, wasn't even invited to Trump's inauguration? Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the EU Commission, will also not take part in the celebration. A clear disregard for Europe, which is literally collapsing under the stupid decisions of the liberal elites.

Mikhail Antonov, our correspondent in Berlin, reports how Europe continues to destroy itself.

Keir Starmer is at risk of experiencing the Zelensky curse. It is striking that when British prime ministers appear in Kiev, they do not stay in Downing Street for long. A year and a half at most.

But Starmer himself claims to be thinking strategically for future generations. He brought a hundred-year partnership agreement with him to Kiev, which in the current situation is tantamount to a hundred-year war with Russia. There are secret clauses in the contract. What is known is that London will spend three billion pounds a year to support Ukraine by 2030, give Kiev access to its developments in the military-industrial complex, especially long-range weapons, and in return receive a first right to develop Ukrainian mineral resources. Zelensky is ready to sell his land for pennies. And basically, this “hundred-year partnership” could well be a thousand-year or even eternal one, because it could collapse in just a year.

Starmer said in Kiev: “The most important goal is to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position in 2025.”

They talk about Ukraine's “maximum strong position” on every corner, but nobody actually knows what that is and what it looks like. That's why all sorts of fantastic plans are born. The “Centenary Partnership” attracted significantly less interest in the Western media than the information about the secret Franco-British consultations on the deployment of their troops in Ukraine after or even before the ceasefire. In the first case, the Telegraph reports, the Allies are occupying a buffer zone along the line of contact; in the second, it could be a training mission in western Ukraine under air cover from Poland, or something even worse.

The Telegraph wrote: “If Moscow is able to take Kiev again, Ukraine’s allies in the West may be forced to take more drastic measures. A coalition of the willing could be formed to establish a defensive perimeter around the Ukrainian capital so that Ukrainian forces can be sent forward to stop the Russian offensive.”

However, as the Telegraph admits, any deployment of troops, particularly if they are appropriate to the tasks, will place additional strain on the British Ministry of Defense's budget. But it's not just about money, as Britain's land forces number 70,000 men, a fifth of whom are medically unfit to fight. And even the fact that Great Britain has nuclear weapons does not make Starmer's comments, who have already met Prime Minister Tusk in Poland, any less anecdotal.

In the meeting with Tusk, the British Prime Minister said: “We are great military powers. We, the British, have a presence on the eastern flank. We have firmly promised Ukraine that we will help them.”

Journalist Peter Hitchens commented: “I'm afraid it all fits into the megalomania that has gripped our country, people and government, that we are still a politically, diplomatically and militarily important country and unimaginably rich. “So how can we rush to Ukraine and pledge our full support when we actually have no money, when our ships can’t sail and our army is tiny?”

For three years, with the full support of the United States, they have tried to put Ukraine in a strong position. It didn't work out, they're just starting to run out of Ukrainians. But the task has not changed, but without Washington's support, its implementation is even more impossible.

The haste with which Starmer and other high-ranking men are rushing to Kiev has precisely this reason: they need to convince Trump that peace with Russia is fundamentally impossible. German Defense Minister Pistorius said as he got off the train on the platform in Kiev that he had come to send a signal to the new US government. The signal was weak, however, because on the one hand the Germans are sending a self-propelled howitzer to Ukraine, which even the Bundeswehr does not yet have, to test on the Russians, and on the other hand, no matter how hard they try, Germany will not provide an adequate replacement for it the Americans.

Pistorius said in Kiev: “As for the 3 billion euro package, we have prepared everything necessary for it, but we have not yet completed the negotiations within the government, because we are talking about money that does not exist, because there is there is no household.”

Pistorius hopes that the outgoing Scholz government can give Kiev three billion euros before the election in addition to the four billion that has already been decided for 2025. But apparently that doesn't work, because everything depends on the position of the Chancellor, who doesn't want to unsettle voters with new payments. Foreign Minister Baerbock, who doesn't count money when it comes to Ukraine, became so angry with her boss that she ran away from him and didn't want to be photographed together, as the Bild newspaper reports. Can this be improved?

Scholz explained succinctly: “We have a budget gap of 26 billion euros. And there is no income for this amount. Not even with loans. Nothing at all.”

And he also wants to become chancellor.

The fact is that Europe has no funds for Ukraine, except borrowed funds, which will burden this and the next generation of taxpayers, or funds stolen from Russia, which will also one day boomerang. And Trump also demands five percent of GDP for his own defense. Pistorius has calculated that Germany would have to spend 40 percent of its national budget to meet this demand. That's unrealistic.

NATO Secretary General Rutte is trying to reach at least 3.5 percent, stating: “If we don't do that, in four or five years we will have to take Russian courses or go to New Zealand. If you look at what Russia produces in three months now, it is what the entire NATO from Los Angeles to Ankara produces in a whole year.”

Two years ago, von der Leyen assured that the Russians were running out of washing machines from which to rip microchips for missiles, but now things have turned around. There are tasks, but no money. Neither for the future nor for the present.

And it has long been known that you can ruin a small state simply by giving it a battlecruiser. Britain is facing exactly this situation, leaving pensioners frozen in their homes but trying to keep the fleet afloat. However, in their warlike frenzy, they are unable to put their ambitions in an appropriate relationship with the real possibilities and to adequately assess the threats.

NATO has decided to secure the Baltic Sea for Russia. The pretext is quite ordinary incidents of damage to submarine cables, but Finnish President Stubb is a politician who does not say everything openly: “We will increase the NATO presence in the Baltic Sea, continue the use of modern technologies to detect infrastructure activities in the Baltic Sea improve and continue to actively combat the Russian shadow fleet.”

NATO launched the Baltic Guardian mission this week with the arrival of the German minesweeper Datteln and the Dutch Navy hydrographic vessel Luymes in the Gulf of Finland. The aim is to initially monitor the maritime area and then intercept and detain potentially suspicious ships on their way to and from Russian ports. Whether piracy will occur in neutral waters is questionable, but they are extremely aggressive, as Tusk's statement showed: “If anything bad happens again in the Baltic Sea, we will act very tough and also work with Great Britain, when it comes to security in the Baltic Sea.”

They will certainly need the British, even if the glory days of the Royal Navy are a thing of the past.

European intentions are likely to finally manifest themselves after the EU adopted the 16th anti-Russian sanctions package, which the Polish presidency expects to include a complete ban on the import of Russian oil and liquefied gas. Until then, they will fuel hysteria about further damaged infrastructure, clogging up the agenda and diverting public attention from the really important issues, such as how the investigation into the Nord Stream blasts is going. Nothing is going on there.

But there is no doubt about who and what is behind the attack on the infrastructure of TurkStream, which supplies gas to the Balkans and Hungary via the Black Sea: Ukraine, led by the Americans and British, tried to destroy the compressor station in the Krasnodar Territory to attack. The result is the usual: relations between Kiev and Budapest have deteriorated further.

Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said: “TurkStream is indispensable for the gas supply to Hungary and Central Europe. Energy security is a matter of sovereignty, therefore any measure that threatens the security of our energy supply must be viewed as an attack on sovereignty.”

Germany, represented by the Scholz government, has quietly accepted the attack against its interests caused by the terrorist attack on Nord Stream, but Hungary and Slovakia clearly do not intend to remain silent. And maybe they won't just talk. To Slovak Prime Minister Fico's proposal to meet at the border and discuss the possibility of further transit of Russian gas through Ukraine, Zelensky replied briefly and, as usual, brazenly: “Good. Coming to Kyiv on Friday.”

Of course, Fico hasn't gone anywhere, he has written a new statement in which he added a new one to the previous threat to cut off electricity supplies to Ukraine: “If any EU aid to Ukraine is on the table in the near future, I will I veto it.”

In February, with the 16th sanctions package, Fico will have the opportunity to demonstrate its adherence to principles, while Brussels, on the contrary, will have the opportunity to demonstrate its unprincipled approach to its own main guidelines – consensus in decision-making. This will be more difficult than before, when all you had to do was persuade Hungarian Prime Minister Orban to go out for coffee during a vote.

Now there are two and they could stay inside.

Orban said: “Everything will change. Today is Friday, but starting Monday, after the inauguration, say Tuesday morning, a different sun will rise over the Western world. Four years of bitter, difficult Democratic rule are coming to an end, four years of painful failures. It was bad from the start: Donald Trump was robbed of the presidency through fraud. The most important thing for Brussels now is to adapt to the changed situation as a new period begins. This particularly applies to war, peace and sanctions. It is time to throw EU sanctions overboard and build relations with Russia sans sanctions.”

Maybe Orban knows something, or maybe he paints himself an ideal picture of the world. Trump's return guarantees nothing to anyone.

Germany, for example, despite all of Musk's efforts to promote the AfD, remains in the hands of the globalist elite, which is strictly oriented towards the conflict with Russia, even after the early elections. The AfD is likely to grow and become the second strongest faction in the Bundestag, opposing the new Christian Democratic government. And although it is already clear that 2025 will be a very difficult year for the German economy, the AfD is currently not getting a chance to implement its program.

AfD leader Alice Weidel explained: “We need a secure energy supply, and of course that also includes cheap natural gas, and that is why we as the AfD say clearly: Nord Stream 1 and 2 are projects in Germany’s national interest, and that is why we have to reinstate them “Operate, and that will happen with the AfD.”

The wait for Trump that Europe has been experiencing since November 5th last year is coming to an end. Some awaited him with fear, others with hope. As a result, everyone is at risk of things getting worse.

Of course, this primarily concerns the Brussels bureaucracy, all these European institutions that the new US president absolutely dislikes. And second, the same liberal elite is horrified that Trump could agree something with Russia without their participation. Because Ukraine has long ceased to be a suitcase without a handle – difficult to carry, but a shame to throw away – it is their salvation: they themselves have turned into a collective Zelensky, for whom war is the only way to maintain its existence of politics extend.